Wednesday, February 18, 2026

Making Time for Research (and You) Article

From "To-Do" to "Ta-Da": Reclaiming Your Calendar with an Intentionality Toolkit

We’ve all been there: that one tab that stays open for three months, or the article printout buried under a stack of interlibrary loan requests. For me, that "someday" read was "Making Time for Research (and You): Using an ‘Intentionality Toolkit’ to Achieve Your Goals and Mitigate Feelings of Overwhelm."

I finally crossed it off my list, and honestly? I wish I’d opened it sooner.

While the article focuses heavily on the academic struggle to balance faculty research with service roles, its core message is a lifeline for any health science librarian feeling the squeeze of "urgent" tasks displacing "important" goals.


As librarians, our work is variable and responsive to others. We respond to urgent literature searches, clinical inquiries, and troubleshooting requests. Because we are "helpers" by nature, our own long-term projects—whether that’s committee work (like writing a blog post 😬), a professional certification, or reorganizing a digital repository—often get pushed to the I can do that later pile.

The "Intentionality Toolkit" suggests that overwhelm isn't just about having too much to do; it's about the cognitive load of trying to keep track of it all while feeling like you're losing control of your time. This rang incredibly true for me. 

Two Game-Changers for Your Workweek

The article outlines several strategies, but two stood out things I'm going to try:

1. The Strategic Brain Dump

Instead of a linear to-do list that grows like a weed, the toolkit encourages a massive weekly or so brain dump.

  • The Goal: Get every "should," "must," and "want" out of your head and onto paper (or a digital board).

  • Why it works: It stops the "open loop" cycle in your brain where you're constantly reminding yourself not to forget "X" while trying to focus on "Y". This is a big struggle for me not be-bopping between all of the tasks. Stopping to check the latest email while in the middle of a literature search really can detail the train of thought. 

2. Intentional Weekly Scheduling

This isn't just about marking meetings. It’s about defensive tattooing of your calendar.

  • The Shift: Rather than looking for gaps in your schedule to do "deep work," you schedule the deep work first often weeks in advance. This is vital for those long-term projects that don't have a screaming deadline but provide the most value to your career or institution. If it isn't on the calendar, it doesn't exist.


Why This Matters for Us

Whether you are in a hospital or university library, the feeling of being "busy but not productive" is a fast track to burnout. It’s about making sure that the goals that actually move the needle for your career—and your well-being—don't get buried under the daily deluge of emails.

The Bottom Line: You don’t need more hours in the day; you need more intention in the hours you have. 

Tuesday, February 10, 2026

Caffeinated Coffee and Tea Associated with Reduced Risk of Dementia

Image by Spike Summers from Pixabay

Good news for fellow caffeine addicts! A new (2026) study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) found an association between drinking caffeinated coffee and caffeinated tea with a reduction in dementia risk. 

The study by Zhang et al., which followed over 131,000 people for up to 43 years, found that drinking caffeinated coffee was associated with an up to 18% reduction in dementia risk, with consumption of caffeinated tea being associated with similar cognitive benefits. According to the study, "the most pronounced associated differences were observed with intake of approximately 2 to 3 cups per day of caffeinated coffee or 1 to 2 cups per day of tea." 

For a plain-language overview of the study, you can check out these articles by Nature and The New York Times. 

Cheers! ☕


Wednesday, February 4, 2026

Rescheduled: MLA Collection Development Caucus Forum- Open to Non-MLA Members

 

The Medical Library Association’s (MLA) Collection Development Caucus has rescheduled its forum on collection development policies. It is now scheduled for Thursday, March 12 at 10am (PT) / 1pm (ET). Please contact gaukh@vcu.edu for the Zoom link.



The session will start with brief presentations from librarians who will talk about how their collection development policies were developed, what their policies include, and some of the challenges they faced in developing them. We will hear from:

 

 

Following the presentations, there will be time for Q&A and discussion. Kayce Gill, from Vanderbilt University and Chair-Elect of the Caucus, will facilitate the session.

 

Non-MLA members are welcome to attend and participate in the discussion. The session will not be recorded to encourage open conversation. 

 

See you there!

Monday, February 2, 2026

Call for questions: Navigating the ADA Title II Digital Accessibility Rule

Compass in front of pond with mountains

The April 2026 compliance deadline is approaching. Is your library ready?

Join five MLA Caucuses (User Experience, Accessibility & Disability, Vision Science, Technical Services, and Technology in Education) for a 90-minute deep dive into the Department of Justice’s new rule impacting websites, LibGuides, databases, and instructional materials.


Event Details

 

Date: Wednesday, February 25, 2026

Time: 1:00 PM Central / 2:00 PM ET/ 12:00 pm MT/ 11:00 AM PT

Who can participate: Anyone! MLA membership not required

Platform: Zoom https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83051394100?pwd=JM4jFRGGBteWR7bB4BDVvrX0hJa1LN.1

We Want Your Questions!  Help our expert panel address your specific "on the ground" challenges—from legacy PDF remediation to vendor accountability. Questions will be anonymized and used to provide actionable, real-world solutions.

Submit Your Questions Here Deadline to submit: Thursday, February 12, 2026 (11:59 PM PST)

See the full text of this rule at ADA.gov: https://www.ada.gov/law-and-regs/regulations/title-ii-2010-regulations/ 


Note: The above text was written by the MLA Multi-Caucus Planning Committee (on behalf of the User Experience, Accessibility & Disability, Vision Science, Technical Services, and Technology in Education Caucuses)

Entertaining Read: Author responds to journal's phishing email with fake paper on "pregnancy cravings for prime numbers"

Fishing pole with net and lures

Image by Kris from Pixabay

Retraction Watch published a guest post on an author's experience submitting a fake paper to a likely fraudulent journal. In addition to being an entertaining read, the post provides a bit of a behind-the-scenes look at some of the predatory tactics employed by potentially fraudulent publishers. 

Spoiler: The author's fake paper was, in fact, published, and, as noted by a commenter, is searchable in databases like OpenAlex and Google Scholar. The paper can also be helpfully summarized by AI tools such as Elicit (which isn't surprising, as Elicit, like many AI literature summarizers, crawls OpenAlex as one of its data sources). 

Summary from Elicit: The paper explores an innovative approach of applying mathematical teaching methods to obstetric learning, revealing significant cognitive and emotional benefits for both pregnant mathematicians and gynecology students. The study by Chiago Pascual et al., 2025 introduced "gyneco-Obstetric Algebraic Didactics" (GOAD) which used mathematical metaophrs like Overay-Function Theorem and Cervix-Dilation Equation. The research involved 120 participants (60 pregnant mathematicians, 60 gynecology students), demonstrating robust sample diversity.


For a firsthand account from someone who had fallen victim to a predatory publisher, I highly recommend checking out this 2019 article from Science by Alan H. Chambers.

Thanks for reading, and hope everyone has a great Monday!