Showing posts with label Professional Development Award. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Professional Development Award. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 14, 2026

2026 WHSLA Professional Development Award

Image from here.

WHSLA is offering 15 awards of up to $575 awards to support members' professional growth.   Awards will be chosen by random drawing from eligible participants the week of February 9th, 2026.

How can I use the award?
  • Continuing education
  • Conference costs (registration, travel, lodging, etc.)
  • AHIP Membership
Requirements
  • Active WHSLA member, current on dues
  • Dues paid by January 31st (no exceptions)
  • Expenses must occur in 2026
  • Share what you learned with WHSLA members within 3 months (WHSLA blog post, Wisdom Chat etc.)
  • If using funds for AHIP membership, agree to run for WHSLA office within 2 years
  • Have not won the stipend drawing in the past 3 years
  • If you won more than 3 years ago, you must have completed your sharing obligation 

Deadline: February 6 at 5pm

Note: MLA 2026 will be in Milwaukee-we hope to see many WHSLA members there!



Dora Davis, MLIS

Coord. CME & Medical Librarian

Center for Learning & Innovation

Human Resources Division | ProHealth Care, Inc.

Tuesday, September 23, 2025

Post by Jannette Bradley, Former Recipient of the WHSLA Professional Development Award!

 As a former recipient of the WHSLA Professional Development award, I am happy to acknowledge that I have completed the coursework for the Level Two Certificate in the Systematic Review Services Specialization. This specialization is sponsored by the Medical Library Association which seeks to enhance the expertise and skills of health information professionals. I used the award to fund the specialization courses. My journey, which began around 2019-2020, has been both challenging and rewarding. I have gained valuable insights into the librarian's role in systematic reviews and am excited to apply these principles when assisting my patrons.

When I started way back in the "olden times" of 2020s, it seemed there were somewhat limited resources available for librarians to enhance their skills in systematic reviews. The University of Michigan course and the course on designing search strategies offered by Washington University were among the primary options. Today, I am thrilled to see the growing number of educational opportunities in this field. This expansion allows librarians not only to strengthen their skill sets but also to elevate the quality of their contributions to research teams.

Through this coursework, I have sharpened my ability to draft complex and reproducible search strategies, an essential skill both for systematic reviews and for the wide range of literature review requests I receive day to day. I have also become more confident in clearly describing the systematic review process to researchers and students, helping them understand where a librarian’s expertise can make a measurable impact on the rigor and transparency of their review.

I am especially looking forward to using new tools in my daily work—not only for systematic reviews but also for narrative reviews, as well as for everyday research consultations. Some of the webinars I have attended during this training, for example, highlighted emerging AI-based tools designed to support various phases of the review process. Learning to critically evaluate these tools and integrate them into my workflows has given me a broader perspective on how librarians can enhance efficiency while maintaining quality and standards.

We are considering how AI tools might be thoughtfully integrated into our research workflows. Included among the courses on offer for this specialization was a session led by Gregory Laynor, “Communicating with Researchers about the Benefits and Risks of AI for Evidence Synthesis.” It was especially thought-provoking and offered useful perspectives for engaging with patrons and colleagues on this evolving topic.

Overall, this certification validates the progress I have made as a professional and represents my ongoing commitment to supporting evidence-based practice. It equips me with both foundational and advanced approaches that I will now apply in my institution when collaborating with patrons. I am grateful for the support of this award, which has allowed me to continue growing in this specialized area of medical librarianship.

Wednesday, April 5, 2023

WHSLA Professional Development Award - Enter Our Annual Drawing to Win $500


In order to support the professional development of its members, WHSLA is offering two $500 awards to eligible WHSLA members.  The recipients of these awards will be chosen by a drawing.  

If you are interested in submitting your name for the drawing, please fill out this form before April 11, 2023.

 

The awards can be used by a member in good standing for either 

  • continuing education
  • conference costs 
  • or towards AHIP membership.  


If the award recipient chooses to use some or all the award toward continuing education or conference costs, such as registration, travel, lodging and meals, they would be required to share the information learned with WHSLA’s membership.  

If the recipient elects to use some of the award toward an AHIP membership, the recipient would be required to run for an elected WHSLA office in the next two years.  It would be expected that if the recipient only uses their award toward AHIP membership, they will only accept the amount needed for AHIP membership and will not accept the remainder of the $500 award. 

 

The awards are available to members in good standing and they will be chosen at random from a drawing of interested and eligible candidates.  Previous award winners are ineligible if it has been less than three years since their award.  If you previously won an award but did not complete your sharing award you are also ineligible.

 

Final notes

  • Sharing can be done through a blog post on the WHSLA Blog, during a WHSLA Chat Session or by other means.
  • Requirements for eligibility:

·         Active WHSLA member and current on dues. (Not current? You can easily pay your dues online via PayPal!)

·         Expenses must take place in 2023.

·         Willingness to share your learnings with WHSLA members within 3 months after the chosen conference.

·         Willingness to run for office in the next 2 years if using stipend for AHIP membership.

·         Have not won the stipend drawing in the past three years. 

The deadline to enter is April 11. If you have questions about your eligibility or the award, please email me at (dora.davis@phci.org).

 

**Requirements will be checked before the drawing and any names not meeting one or more of them will be removed prior to the drawing.  Please review these carefully.**

 

Dora Davis

WHSLA Professional Development Coordinator

 

Dora Davis, MLIS

Coord. CME & Medical Librarian

Human Resources |Center for Learning and Innovation

Docline: WIUWAU

Phone: (262)928-2814

Friday, November 20, 2020

Professional Development Award Report: FYE (First Year Experience) Conference

Carrie Papa-Schold was a recipient of one of the two WHSLA 2020 Professional Development Awards. Below, she tells us about her experience at a pre-COVID conference. 

===============================

Thank you WHSLA for the grant towards attending the FYE (First Year Experience) Conference in Washington, D.C. on February 21 – 24, 2020.  (Yes, just before Covid hit the US.)

In my current job at George Williams College (GWC) in Williams Bay, WI, I am the Assistant Director of Academic Support and Disability Services.  I also help out with the library as the “campus librarian”.  GWC is part of Aurora University in Aurora, Illinois where the Phillips Library Director manages of all of the contracts through CARLi.  We have a small library (located at one end of a building on two floors with two fireplaces, 8 computers, three study tables and seating for an additional 8 more students) that is staffed mostly by student workers. https://gwc.aurora.edu/academics/library/index.html

In my role, in academic support, I am an academic coach working with students who are underprepared for college.  Most are from low income and first generation families. The work with the freshmen class is what brought me and my supervisor to the FYE Conference.  The purpose of the conference is to bring together educators and administrators to teach and learn about enhancing the first year student experience.  I was thrilled to find that about a dozen of the presentations and poster sessions were on Information Literacy.  I was fortunate to attend 3 of them.

Poster sessions (The following was the one I was most interested in seeing and talking with the presenter)

Information Literacy Misconception of Students in First-Year Experience Courses. Michelle Keba. Palm Beach Atlantic University.

This poster was of a study (not yet published) done by Michell Keba at her institution using the methods from the research article Predictable Information Literacy Misconception of First-year College Students (Hinchcliffe, Rand, & Collier, 2018).  The original study was designed to determine if students either lacked knowledge versus misperceived their information literacy skills using the “misconception inventory”.  By identifying common misconceptions, potential learning outcomes were developed to guide information literacy instruction.  The misconceptions identified in the Hinchcliffe et al. (2018) article are:

·         Library

o   First year students believe they are supposed to do their research without assistance

o   First year students perceive the library as only a place to get books or to study

o   First year students believe that all library sources and discovery tools are credible

·         Information Access

o   First year students believe that freely available Internet resources are sufficient for academic work

o   First year students think Google is a sufficient search tool

o   First year students believe that accessibility is an indicator of quality

·         Research Process

o   First year students believe that research is a linear, uni-directional process

o   First year students think that every question has a single answer

·         Information Literacy

o   First year students believe that they are information literate

Hinchliffe, L., Rand, A., & Collier, J. (2018). Predictable Information Literacy Misconceptions of First-Year College Students. Communications in Information Literacy, 12(1), 4–18. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1183245

The New Library Session: Forget the Library - Focus on Information.  Elizabeth Johns, Kristen Shonborn, Kristen Welzenbach.  Goucher College.  Tinyurl.com/fye20-goucher

Faculty request librarians to teach students about the library and how to use it.  What students need is how to identify appropriate information sources from the internet to library databases.  This is a shift to teaching students about information literacy to address the information era abundant with credible and non-credible information.

Developing Interdepartmental Information Literacy Solutions: The First Year Experience in the Misinformation Era. Kate Otto, David Lemmons, & Sherry Larson-Rhodes. Marquette University.

Information is easily accessible through the library, internet, and social media to name a few.  Students need to learn the value of good information versus bad.  Information literacy efforts help to educate students on how to locate, evaluate, and effectively/ethically use the information they are accessing regardless where they find the information.  Librarians play key role in leading information literacy efforts.

There are three types of “information”.

1.       Misinformation – unintentional

2.       Disinformation – intentional, false, shared to cause harm

3.       Mal-information – intentional, true, and harmful

This is a life-skill to be used throughout college and career.

Education on information literacy can be achieved through collaborative efforts on campus.  The first step is to define “information literacy” to ensure understanding between faculty and staff.  The Association of College & Research Libraries Association (ACRL is a section of the American Library Association) offers guidelines and a framework for information literacy in higher education that can be used to guide initiatives in the college setting.

Outcomes from conference attendance:

·         Gathering information on where information literacy is being taught on campus to identify gaps in student learning regarding information literacy

·         Created a module on information literacy that has been incorporated into academic coaching

·         Developing a module for the senior seminar class on how to effectively locate information post college when they no longer have access to the subscription databases.

Respectfully submitted by:

Carrie Papa-Schold, MLIS
papaschold at gmail dot com